source: tanjug.rs |
No one talks about the election fraud in Serbia
anymore, it seems. Yes, look at the date, May 19, less than two weeks after Dveri called
the regime out on the election fraud. Sure, Dveri are leading street protests,
rallying thousands of people against the injustice. But no one talks about the theft, no one who can
alleviate the created negative charge by reasoning and offering solutions.
The memory of the slaughtered is short; they
forget quickly and they get slaughtered anew as soon as they forget where the
wolves come from. That's what the enemy has traditionally relied on. The Tadić regime media, which includes virtually every major
outlet in Serbia, has been painstakingly and systematically subduing the fraud
clamor, the protests under their windows, the overwhelming evidence, the truth,
simply by ignoring it and substituting it with trivialities produced on an
hourly basis. A bared piece of ass on
the Serbian version of Survivor is quicker to grab the headlines than the
effigy of Boris Tadić in prison garb being displayed by the enraged thousands
across Belgrade. ''Save Serbia and get lost, Boris!'' is worth 7 seconds of Dnevnik, the prime time newscast, if
that. The airwaves are simply silent. The coverage of the protests was simply
suppressed. What assignment editor would otherwise ignore several thousand
people marching through downtown Belgrade in protest of the worst offense to
democracy, the election fraud?
Debates in the social media arena are, however,
raging, with the opposition-minded Serbs often bitterly divided. Tomislav
Nikolić's Progressives and Vojislav Koštunica's Democratic Party of Serbia
formed the post-election coalition on Wednesday and rallied behind Nikolić in
the presidential election run-off, rejecting the open arms of Dveri, who called
for a united front in protesting the first round fraud and demanding a repeat
election. The rapidly growing Dveri followers, joined by a number of
ideologically like-minded Radicals, whose party is incapacitated by infighting
and the election disaster, have pledged to boycott the run-off, de-legitimizing
it and continuing to demand the annulment of the rigged first round. Dveri claimed
that the SNS-DSS coalition effectively recognized the validity of the first
round by participating in the run-off. The new patriotic block denied this,
with Nikolić citing his moral impetus to act responsibly towards Serbia and try
to win on Sunday. Koštunica was mainly motivated by preserving the Constitution
against changes, which the regime hinted at. His coalition with Nikolić
prevents the regime from securing two-thirds of the National Assembly votes
necessary to amend or replace the Constitution. Facebook and Twitter
discussions have ignored these aspects and focused solely on whether the
participation in the run-off was treacherous or the last attempt at grasping a straw
of salvation.
source: rts.rs |
Dveri supporters advocated street protests, the
refusal of SNS and DSS deputies to accept the parliamentary nominations and
further efforts at de-legitimizing the regime by insisting on the fraud issue.
They have been nothing but consistent in adamantly opposing the run-off
participation. The Nikolić and Koštunica supporters countered by warning that a
no-vote for Nikolić is a vote for Tadić. The fragmentation of the patriotic
voting body in the run-up to Sunday has just exemplified the distorted view of
priorities among the nationalist Right.
Regime's social media vanguard has been gloating
at the inter-opposition squabble, adding fuel to the fire here and there, but
mainly diverting the conversation towards subjects of no significance, creating
an illusion that the election fraud debates are either over, irrelevant or not
cool. Their tone is mellow, and when it's not ridiculing, it's full of the
return-to-normal undertones. What election fraud? Don't be sore losers. What
raping of democracy? Don't be conspiracy theorists. I must notice that,
following some of the so-called ''influential'' Twitterers in Serbia, among the
tons of inconsequential blurbs, the tweets that meant to say something weren't
unequivocal in their support for the regime, or rather, weren't consistent. It
was clear that their purported allegiance swayed as their take on what the election
outcome would be was flip-flopping. Most of these ''influencers'' were
preoccupied with staying relevant and staying employed, and while there were
some principled ones, the majority kept at an arm's distance from overtly and
loudly rooting for Tadić. I can't say they were objective; they were just cautious
and cowardly, I'd say. I have to admit their apparent fear of staying loyal to
the regime tricked me into believing that the opposition had a chance to win in
the parliamentary round.
Serbia is on the edge again. Even Novak Đoković,
err, his family, supported Tadić. His father was one of the speakers at the
Democratic Party's closing convention, following such dignitaries as Milorad
Dodik, Dragan Đilas, Nenad Čanak and Rasim Ljajić, as well as few foreigners on
the video conference call that lent support to Tadić. I thought it was
deplorable that Tadić reached for Đoković and pulled him into the mud, but I
also thought it was a telling sign of Tadić's vulnerability, regardless of the
fact that he can just rig the vote. And Novak is a grown man, he should have
known better.
source: dverisrpske.com |
I say Serbia is on the edge and it may slip off
regardless of the election outcome. Tadić's re-election, if it happens, has
been irreversibly marred and his power will be de-legitimized no matter what. No
one talks about the fraud on the airwaves, but it will take time for the
Serbian people to forget it. Boris Tadić is the most reviled person in the
country and such a polarizing figure that those on the opposite side of the
aisle will not forget easily, especially since his regime rendered economic
collapse inevitable and such a development can easily compound the
fraud-related emotion buildup to push the country over the edge. People are
chanting ''fraud'' now, but it may turn into an outrage and a riot quickly, and
it will all be Tadić's fault. They say he stole from them, in more ways than
one, and they think he is now ignoring their concerns and despising them, which is blatantly
obvious.
4 comments:
Whatever they may say publicly, I think most people who loathe Tadić will hold their noses and vote for Nikolić, just to see him gone. Sure, it gives elections legitimacy, but it's a lot easier to question that legitimacy after Comrade Bota is out of power. If he stays, the only remaining remedy is force.
What is your opinion in question of winning presidency by Nikolic. I wouldny't be surprised if suddenly on Monday media tell that Tadic win by te way here is translation on polish your article from 19 may 2011
http://saurom.blog.onet.pl/1,AR3_2012-05_2012-05-01_2012-05-31,index.html
The Nikolic win was a surprise for me because the grasp of Tadic's government over the society was so powerful in a very undemocratic way.
I don't think a Monday turnaround is possible. There's probably been a deal made, whereby Nikolic wouldn't join Dveri protests, but would bargain for power with that as an option. The question was not whether Nikolic could beat Tadic, but whether the West would allow that. There either had to be guarantees made by Nikolic that he wouldn't impede their progress in conquering Serbia or a Russian pushback by which Nikolic's rise to power wouldn't be impeded by the West. Something along those lines.
This is a power-sharing arrangement, since the president doesn't wield a lot of power. It was a huge success for Nikolic personally, since it's a vindication of the years he strove to win. This was a crucial win for the Serbian nationalists, if we allow ourselves to see Nikolic as someone who can serve nationalist interests.
I'll write more on this in the next article.
Thanks for translating the article into Polish.
Regards.
You should see those that Dinkic called "influential" Twitterists, or whatever the proper term is. The hypocrisy is enormous. The pendulum was swinging several times a day. People that are most likely paid to "influence" really turned out to be a bad investment for Tadic.
Post a Comment