Kosovo Serbs: Presumed Guilty

source: rtv.rs

Five days have passed and the killer of the EULEX officer is still unknown. 
On September 19, attackers killed one and wounded three EULEX members of the Customs Component in an ambush near the village of Balaban in Zvečan municipality. In the run-up to the controversial parliamentary election in Kosovo, scheduled for November 3 and projected to involve the North Kosovo Serbs for the first time, the murder of Audrius Šenavičius, while initially provoking a whirlwind of reactions, especially from Belgrade, has been quietly pushed under the carpet as no news of it have come out after September 19.
Not in the mainstream media, at least. 

This story is not unusual in itself; attacks on the Western forces occupying Kosovo have happened before and they all came from the Albanian side (now, this may sound surprising to the not-so-well-informed observers). What was unusual is the rapid reaction by the official Belgrade. Both Prime Minister Ivica Dačić and his First Deputy Aleksandar Vučić immediately sharply condemned the attacks. Dačić blurted out that this was a "bullet fired into Serbia's future," and Vučić threatened a "fierce response" by the Serbian government. Both statements strongly implied that it was Serbs who killed Audrius Šenavičius. News portal InSerbia quoted Dačić as saying that this was "an extremist and not a patriotic act." 
"This is an attempt to ruin everything Serbia has achieved in the past period. Serbia has no right to remain silent and allow terrorists and extremists to believe that they are the ones who can manage Serbia,” said Vučić. (inserbia.info)

 Both men apparently assumed that the act was perpetrated by disgruntled Serbs who felt an attack on EULEX would constitute an act of revenge, a patriotic act of sorts. They assumed this despite the fact that Serbs in Kosovo do not have a history of ambush attacks against the occupying forces. They know well that Serbs in Kosovo only resisted being integrated into the Albanian state, and always used non-violent methods against heavily armed KFOR and EULEX. But, for whatever reason, Dačić and Vučić went out on a limb to assume Serbs killed the EULEX officer.

Why would they assume this?

source: vestinet.rs

Well, I would call it projecting rather than assuming. Dačić and Vučić have experienced problems forcing the North Kosovo Serbs into the Albanian state of Kosovo. The agreement that Dačić signed with Catherine Ashton and Hashim Thaci on April 19, 2013, naturally was not well received in North Kosovo. After all, the local Serbs to which the terms of the agreement most directly apply were never consulted. The Brussels Agreement literally abolished the remaining institutions of the Republic of Serbia in its occupied province of Kosovo and Metohija and removed all the protections of the rights of Kosovo Serbs. The upcoming election is the final step in completely subordinating the Kosovo Serbs to the legal system of the Albanian "Republic of Kosovo," occupied and ran by NATO and EU.
So, naturally, there is a lot of animosity between the Kosovo Serbs and Belgrade leadership. The North Kosovo Serbs had their democratic referendum in which they overwhelmingly decided against their integration into the Albanian state. They issued declarations voicing their opposition to and fear from the subordination. They formed their interim people's assembly to assert their political unity in opposition to the occupation. The official Belgrade, led by Dačić, Vučić and president Tomislav Nikolić, ignored their wishes and bribed and threatened many into subordination. Others they simply removed. 
The opposition, however, is still swelling and its calls for a boycott of the Brussels-imposed elections still alarms Belgrade, whose representatives have specific orders from Brussels to see this through or risk falling out of favor with their imperial overlords. 

So, now, Dačić and Vučić could hardly wait for a false flag attack, or a real attack, to accuse the disobedient Kosovo Serbs of extremism and of undermining Serbia's future, and, in the best fashion of Western political students, use the events as pretext to swoop in, make arrests of key political opponents, scare the rest and clear the path towards the subordination of all the Kosovo Serbs to the Albanian government in Priština. 
How else would anyone explain the reaction from Belgrade?

source: b92.net

Belgrade has relinquished all its authority in its occupied province and to matter-of-factly state it will respond in a fierce way is plain ridiculous. Of course, NATO and the EU forces in Kosovo can let the Serbia's investigators to come in and help rummage around Serb areas, but only because it suits them, not because it empowers Belgrade in any way. 

The natural, professional and diplomatic reaction would be to take it easy, condemn the attack in a neutral way while the investigation is ongoing, and shut up. But no, without even asking what happened, Serbia's leaders rush in to show fierce loyalty to their colonial overlords. A "Hail!" from Belgrade would be in order here.

I'm only making sensible points here, trying to observe this abnormal reaction opposite a normal one we are used in situations that are less politicized. Which professional politician, in his right mind, rushes to conclusions and goes on a limb like that, without following any rational or procedural logic? A puppet with orders, of course.

Say, an Albanian did this. This is a more likely scenario not because I wish Serbs are not at fault here, but for the obvious reason of this particular crime scene location being notorious for Albanian extremist activity and because it is the Albanians who wish to clear the obstacles for subordination of North Kosovo. They are the onesAnd what is more like them than to commit a crime and blame Serbs for it? To outright wave off false flags and false pretexts amidst the global political turmoil in which they abound would be stupid. 

Serbian media under the corporate or state control did not go in depth reporting about the investigation. The EULEX website had no updates after the original press release, which is not unusual. But the one looking for more background information on the attack can find in Serbian independent news sources. Thus, the news portal New Serb Political Thought (NSPM) lined up reasons to believe this attack was committed by local Albanians.

source: srbinaokup.info

Namely, NSPM cites other, well-documented attacks by Albanians in this narrow area where the Mitrovica-Leposavić main road leans on the Albanian-inhabited villages of Žaže, Boljetin and Lipa, in Zvečan municipality.
In 2003, local Albanians attempted to tear down a nearby railroad bridge. The Albanian National Army (ANA) took responsibility for this murder after the UNMIK spokesperson denied the possibility of ANA's involvement.
Later that year, an Indian member of UNMIK was killed at the exact same location. The Albanian National Army (ANA) took responsibility for this murder as well. 
In 2006, a Ukrainian member of KFOR was shot when Albanians fired on KFOR convoy in the same area. 
The notorious video footage of Albanian snipers menacingly observing the main road was shot by a Tirana Albanian channel in this location on April of 2012. Serbian pleas to disarm the former members of KLA roaming the area went unheeded. According to Belgrade newspaper Novosti, KFOR spokesman Mark Stimmler said for the occasion that the local Albanians were armed neither more nor less than it was customary!
Adding to these instances of attacks against NATO, Albanian civilians stoned Serbian buses on the same road on numerous occasions. 

All in all, judging by the past experience, if one is going to make any assumptions, it's safe to assume that local Albanians killed the Lithuanian. Whatever the investigation produces, Belgrade leadership's assumption that Serbs have done this is malicious and extremely short-sighted and amateurish. This is not to say that it should be taken lightly, quite the opposite. 

According to reports from mainstream media, denied by Aleksandar Vulin, Serbia’s special envoy for Kosovo, Belgrade sent about 150 plain-clothed policemen into North Kosovo to ostensibly help in the investigation, but in effect to further enforce the already forceful message Serbia's official envoys have been spreading to the Kosovo Serbs: Don't you dare oppose us! Under what other circumstances would NATO, EULEX and the Albanian authorities have agreed to let the official Serbia back into the conquered land?

As Enver Hoxhaj, the rogue state's foreign minister, hinted at in yesterday's interview to the Wall Street Journal, Belgrade did get the green light to storm in under the investigation pretext and repress the opposition to the subordination process. It's not surprising that an Albanian official accuses local Serbs of killing the EULEX official in the area where only his Albanians conduct attacks and kill foreigners, but the fact that the official Belgrade does so builds an entirely new, although not-so-unexpected, political dimension.

Five days after the initial assumption and the accusatory reaction, though, whatever investigation is going on is not producing any results. But, the Serbs must have done it, right? Such is the presumption of guilt on the Imperial frontier. 

A Postcard from the Colonial Serbia

The Republic of Serbia is sliding deeper into the neo-colonial state with every decision and every public statement its leaders make. The North Atlantic Empire and its collaborators have been tightening the noose around the neck of the Serbian people for decades through physical destruction and takeover of assets, and increasingly, by literally appointing its leaders and their advisers. It is important to separate Serbia's leadership from its people and emphasize that the ostensibly inefficient leadership has been put in place to be inefficient in advancing the interest of the society, but very efficient at executing the imperialist agenda by not fighting against it and allowing its operatives to freely roam. They are not the best Serbia has; they are merely the ones best serving the agenda of the Empire and one important part of that agenda is to prevent the truly best and truly patriotic from rearing their head.
Where to start delving into such an expansive subject?

While in the years of Boris Tadić Serbia relinquished any political leverage for defending its occupied province of Kosovo and Metohija, the events made a hopeful turn with the surprising victory of Tomislav Nikolić in the presidential election in May of 2012. While the deeply corrupt administration of Tadić simply had to go for the sake of - so was hoped - Serbia's salvation, the pre-mature announcement of Nikolić's victory, coming from Brussels of all places, signaled that the post-Tadić era may not bring the substantial changes Nikolić's voters had hoped for. And outside of changing the cast, the decades-long scenario for Serbia's destruction kept being adhered to. Nikolić's politics is a continuation of Tadić's, with a lot of acceleration and a lot more deception.

Only a year later, the Serbian political leadership de facto recognized the secession of Kosovo. Although they deny it in a very amateurish and sloppy way, Serbia's leaders did agree to recognize Kosovo's Albanian government as it sees itself, as well as the borders, customs, tax jurisdiction, symbols, and the legal systems. Anyone who can read the documents they signed with Hashim Thaci can see nothing but a not-so-implicit recognition. On top of that, the Ivica Dačić-Aleksandar Vučić axis of power has been forcing the insofar resilient Serbs of Kosovo to abolish their self-rule and subject themselves to the rule of Hashim Thaci's administration. And they have been doing this while feigning great difficulties in preserving Serbia's integrity and emphasizing the imperative of Serbia continuing on its path towards the European Union. Meanwhile, the statements from Brussels and Berlin have been clear: without the explicit recognition of the Republic of Kosovo, Serbia cannot hope to ever join the Union, regardless of what else it concedes along the way and what dangled carrot it bites into from now to then. When you willingly concede a trench to the advancing enemy (and the leading EU countries have been the foremost promoters and sponsors of Kosovo's secession from Serbia, even fighting a war against Serbia to that end), and you justify the deed by the desire to please the enemy and get taken over by it, your allegiances are clear beyond questioning: you are the agency of your people's enemy.

The amount of deception involved in the process of giving up Kosovo at the orders of Brussels has been mind-boggling and defeating. The levels and the nature of deception are not characteristic only to the Kosovo narrative; it is omnipresent, but it is most obvious here, because the Kosovo issue is more straightforward than, say, the broad and vague subject of corruption. 

source: novosti.rs

In the process of blocking any form of patriotic discourse out of the mainstream, the Serbian public space has become completely dominated and polluted by the basest kind of public relations maneuvering, the most distasteful content and the lowest scum journalism and politics could produce. The media organizations, void of ownership and financing transparency or, in other cases, owned by Western European media conglomerates, cleansed journalists of integrity and true servants of the public from its ranks. Honorable exceptions are rare, subdued and trying to survive and feed their families.

The tabloids, ever-ready to serve any regime, came to dominate Serbia's news arena by appealing to the lowest instincts of the average readers, in the dirtiest fashion of Hollywood's and CNN's "dumb-it-down" methods.

Vučić's omnipresent "war on corruption" has been the best example of this. 
Vučić, in slapping together the cabinet after the election last year, took for himself several unrelated posts and carved up the cabinet so that he gradually became identified as the increasingly dominant force within it, despite the fact that he was not the prime minister. The image of a dictator has been in the making by the public relations architects for some time and the Serbian public has been carpet-bombed by it through the ubiquitous tabloids. Although he hasn't been formally in charge of any aspect of any state mechanism that could be reasonably expected to lead and execute the fight against corruption, the ostensible victories have been associated with his name. The strongest effect of the so-called "war on corruption" has been the raising of the profile of Vučić. In all actuality, and this is becoming more painfully obvious, this "war" was nothing but a decoy needed to protect the true baron robbers of Serbia from punishment. After a year of bombastic arrests, well-publicized by the tabloids well ahead of time, all we could see was a selective justice, or no justice at all, for the sake of removing the politically inexpedient out of the way of advancement of others who wanted to take their place and their loot. We could also see no attempt to reform the judicial system as a force in reducing corruption. We saw a man being put up on a pedestal; this man, armed with self- and regime-serving tabloids, deceived the public that there was a fight against those that robbed it and that he was the one to be praised for it. More than a year later, some of the arrested have been let go, some have been kept in detention, some have been indicted but not tried, and most of those who the Serbian public equates in guilt with those targeted are still walking the streets, more powerful than before. Meanwhile, it's never been easier to buy a master degree, to perform a surgery without any expertise, to run an energy conglomerate without any qualifications, to procure a favor, to fix a public bid... How do you imagine fighting corruption with the same Minister of Interior, the same state police chief and the same special prosecutor for organized crime in place? If Dačić, Milorad Veljović and Miljko Radisavljević wanted to fight and not to protect the corrupt, they would've started years ago. Or are we saying they were prevented by their boss, Tadić, from fighting corruption? Why hasn't Tadić been brought to justice then?

source: kurir-info.rs

The most recent example has been the so-called "reconstruction" of the cabinet. The one-year old cabinet was "reconstructed," 11 new ministers were named into 22 departments, all of this without the parliamentary election and without naming specific reasons and specific performance deficiencies of the replaced ministers. Simply, the cake needed to be cut anew, but outside of democratic procedures. If half the cabinet ministers did a bad job, what exact bad job did they do? How does such a huge number of under-performers reflect on the cabinet overall, i.e. if half the cabinet warrants replacement, should not the entire cabinet fall? Doesn't the entire cabinet warrant the examination of its work possible only via parliamentary election? But no one in the mainstream media demanded answers to these questions. Dačić and Vučić decided they wanted to stay in power despite the horrendous performance of their selected teams, and the people had no say in it. The deception succeeded to the degree of people not thinking they should have a say in it.

To sum up, the Serbian public was deceived to think that the regime change brought relief and that the new regime is "fixing problems," as Serbs like to word it, while, in effect, there has been no interruption in the process of subordinating and plundering Serbia. In hindsight, the only reason the regime change was necessary was the continued deception: Tadić and his cohorts were bringing the dissatisfaction to the boiling point, so the fresh faces and fresh impressions were needed. The process could only continue uninterrupted if the critical mass of people does not get enraged by the installed puppets' actions to the point where it'd rise up and drag them into the streets, or, God forbid, do something more serious, like pull its savings out of the banks and commit mass credit default.

To make the deception even graver, the economic side of things doesn't look any brighter. While the NATO aggression on Serbia left its infrastructure and industrial production in shambles, as was the war's objective, the violent regime change colloquially referred to as the Fifth of October (of 2000), opened the already trembling floodgates for marauding Western imperial shock therapists and economic hit men. For the past 13 years, the economic narrative of Serbia has been one of corrupt privatization processes, artificially induced defaults, forceful acquisitions, rising unemployment, decline in production, a loan upon a loan from the IMF and other imperial loan-sharks, the ever-expanding political power of economic tycoons and the fire sale of all of Serbia's valuable economic assets that anyone was interested in. And, most tellingly, the siphoning of live cash out of the county in alarming amounts. In other words, a re-colonization. A war on corruption is an impetus, but unless the indictments start with the likes of Mlađan Dinkić and other corrupt government officials, it remains a hoax. After all, only those elected and appointed to serve the public can be corrupt. But the Empire would never install a regime that would work in the interest of the Serbian public and against its own.

source: dailymail.co.uk

Under Nikolić, Ivica Dačić and Aleksandar Vučić, the colonization not only intensified, but became more blatant and flagrant. While Slobodan Milosevic used to bring in accomplished Serbs from the Diaspora to raise the legitimacy of his regime, and while during the years of Zoran Đinđić and Vojislav Koštunica - and Tadić, for that matter - a number of Serbian expatriates that returned to participate in Serbia's politics and economy were at least well-qualified, if not well-intentioned, the new Serbian regime made it a trend to employ unqualified Serbs, from within and from abroad, and to make the travesty more heinous, to hire such mercenaries as Alfred Gusenbauer, the much-maligned and much-investigated former prime minister of Austria, and Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the former head of the IMF who, for well-publicized reasons unrelated to his economic expertise, needs no special introduction. Not to mention the fact that the pre-eminent "killer" of Serbia's economy, Dinkić, the man who for 13 years presided over Serbia's ever-nosediving economy, most recently heading the Ministry of Finance, remained in government even after his party was kicked out of the coalition. He's now the vice-something in Vučić's committee for cooperation with United Arab Emirates. 

That's another change the new regime introduced. In the spirit of Nikolić's campaign promise, the only one he kept, Serbia's new regime has turned to all four sides of the world in looking for buyers and colonial masters, as opposed to Tadić's customary sycophantic gaze into the West. UAE's crown prince Mohammed bin Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan is leading the way in buying off Serbia's remaining defunded and defunct assets. Apparently, the colonization seed-and-bait money is coming from the Persian Gulf now, so Dinkić, who always had his ear to the tracks, is in charge of filtering it through, and siphoning the profits out and around. The Islamic influence in general is gaining ground in Serbia, through investments and culture, and the regime is doing nothing to slow it down. Remember, one of Belgrade's premier parks still boasts a statue of former Azerbaijani dictator Heydar Aliyev, erected in his honor by Tadić and Dragan Đilas, the mayor of Belgrade, because Aliyev's son, the current dictator, spent some money beautifying the park. Mind-boggling, I say.

Serbia hoped for a change when Nikolić beat Tadić on the third attempt. After all, Nikolić was a radical nationalist, who, for 17 years prior to his split with the Serbian Radical Party, had been ranting against the practices that brought Serbia to its knees. It was clear Nikolić and his sidekick Vučić weren't the same politicians before and after the summer of 2008, but understanding what any Serbian nationalist would be up against in trying to come to power, and figuring that the old Radical notions of the united Serbdom weren't feasible anymore, and imagining the rift within the party starring Vojislav Šešelj on one and Nikolić and Vučić on the side, a lot of Serbian moderate and progressive nationalists secretly hoped Nikolić and Vučić were trying to deceive the Empire.

The most damaging, but potentially the most cathartic effect, however, was the cooptation of the traditional nationalist political current into the imperial agenda. It is damaging for an obvious reason: the patriotic ideology has no more significant outlets or outfits as Nikolić and Vučić didn't just crossed to the dark side, but brought along a lot of moderate nationalists as well, depriving them of the opportunity to align with their true ideology. An entire range on the political spectrum has been occupied by the followers of Nikolić and Vučić for years, because of who they were and what they said. Even those nationalists who didn't like the two, flocked to their support in opposition to the colonial regime of Tadić's Democratic Party. Now, while some have awakened and others are beginning to, the Nikolić-Vučić range still occupies a significant voting bloc. Some people vote for Nikolić's and Vučić's Serbian Progressive Party by instinct, some have conveniently flown over from losing parties, but more importantly, a lot of nationalists will abstain from the process completely, thus giving up their power as citizens and contributing to the imperial agenda remaining dominant. 

Of course, Serbia won't get better for it and that brings out the cathartic aspect of the otherwise damaging effect of cooptation. Ideologically, the Progressives have become indistinguishable from their opponents and predecessors in power, and the trend shows that while they still occupy a large chunk of the nationalist range of the ideological spectrum, they will be sliding into the realm formerly held by the Democratic Party and squeeze it out or get enmeshed with it. Tabloids, propaganda and deception can't put bread on people's tables, and as a colonial regime, the Progressives and their Socialist allies, together with their esteemed advisers, cannot do anything to help Serbia's economy and living standards, if they cared to, just like the Democrats couldn't and won't. 

The question is how long can the Empire continue stringing up and recycling puppets before the disenfranchised Serbian people draw the line, and how long will the nationalists who flocked to the Progressives keep making up excuses for Nikolić and Vučić, before realizing they have been deceived, humiliated and betrayed. Fortunately for the Empire, while the polyarchical socio-political system it has built in Serbia doesn't stop people from distancing themselves and opposing the colonial regime, it does prevent them from grouping together under a single banner. The opposing ideological realm is cut up into very small groupings that are generally disappointed offshoots of dominant currents and that have no common ground to stand on. The Empire is not safe from having its colonial regime overthrown, as the popular energy can be built up to that end, but it seems safe from facing an alternative system, opposed to it, being set up. 

What concerns me the most is that the Empire, once its puppet masters feel their interests have been satisfied as much as the current regime was capable of, or once they see a real threat to the puppet regime in the form of accumulated popular opposition, would usurp the energy built up around the opposition, activate trained activist cells dormant within the NGOs the Western funds and institutes have set up and financed, stage another violent coup and concoct a new political narrative that will extend its domination over Serbia.