source: serbianna.com |
Among other
well-publicized issues, Serbian Deputy Prime Minister Aleksandar Vučić drew
more positive attention to himself in the past few days by calling to accountability
a fellow minister who participated in the ceremony of unveiling of a
commemorative plaque in honor of a well-known Fascist from the World War II
era. Namely, Minister Sulejman Ugljanin, a Bosniak from the Raška region, was
present at the commemoration of one Aćif Hadžiahmetović, better known as Aćif
Efendi, in Novi Pazar. Vučić asked for a special meeting in which the rest of
the cabinet criticized Ugljanin for supporting a local move that showed
disregard for the anti-Fascist tradition of the Serbian people and for the
victims of the Fascist militia leader in question. The cabinet decided it
wanted the plaque removed. Ok, there you
go, problem solved.
Well, hold
your horses, this is the Balkans where no solution is quick...
Some of the
Western-collaborationist Serbian media characters drew a parallel between Vučić
criticizing Ugljanin and his support for the rehabilitation of the Serbian
Chetnik commander, general Draža Mihailović, whom the media-dominating Western
puppetry in Serbia still considers a Nazi collaborator, based on the Yugoslav
Communist determination that Nazi collaborators were all who didn't join the
Partisans. Of course, I expected nothing less from the anti-Serb
foreign-sponsored cohorts of Serbia's NGO world, but regardless of their quickness
to justify any anti-Serb action, a thorough historians' effort should finally
be undertaken to clarify who's who of Serbia's World War II bloody waters. Now,
I and many other Serbs know a hero of two world
wars and the first resistance fighter against Hitler in the occupied
Europe cannot be equated with a Fascist crony, but the Serbian nation, for the
sake of understanding its own role in the recent European history and to shut
the mouth of the anti-Serb agitators, has to get this part of their history
straight.
Vučić and
Ugljanin aside, ghosts of the World War II German occupation of Serbia and the
civil war that ensued parallel with the anti-Fascist resistance haven't stopped
roaming its mountains and valleys since one side in the conflict, Tito's
Communists, was brought into power by the Red Army and Winston Churchill. The
Allies won, and the Communists won, and they each wrote a version of history
that glorified their noble purposes and vilified their enemies. Fine, every
victor in history has done that without much regard for facts or justice. The
evil of Italian Fascism and German Nazism was defeated and the
Nuremberg trial told the story of the war as the offspring was supposed to
learn it. The offspring of the warring South Slavic factions, however, learned
several different versions of the story and the fall of Yugoslav Communism in
1990 opened a Pandora's box of unresolved historical disputes that very much
affected the state-building and reconciliation processes.
source: teslasociety.org |
Without going
into the well known historical detail, I want to stick with Aćif Efendi's case
versus the cases of Serbs accused by the Communist regime of collaborating with
the Nazi occupier. Who he was, the history knows. Tito's Communists executed him
for ''collaborating with the occupier'' which was a vague qualification. The
local Serbs see Aćif Efendi as an enemy whose
Fascist Sandžak Muslim Militia killed thousands of Serb Orthodox
peasants in the Raška region (or Sandžak, as local Muslims call it). This
Sandžak Muslim Militia fought as a Nazi paramilitary appendix until it was
defeated. It targeted Serbs, without differentiating their Royalist or
Communist allegiance. To be clear, the Nazi Germans were the aggressor and the
occupier of Yugoslavia as well as the dominant military force, capable of
committing the most severe atrocities of all the warring factions. Those who
fought alongside it were its appendices with similar capabilities, incomparable
to the lesser capabilities of the resistance fighters, either the Communists
Partisans or the Royalist Chetniks. These two were just guerrilla, fighting the
Nazis and their domestic collaborators such as the Croats or the Sandžak
Muslims, as well as each other. To fight each other, each side on more than
occasion put aside the fight against the Germans. Aćif Efendi was, no doubt, a
German helper and a fighter against the resistance movement of both varieties,
enabled to commit mass murder on a scale his Nazi mentors were notorious for.
And his Sandžak Muslims had every right to form their own fighting units and
side with whoever they thought would further their causes. The Raška Muslims
have every right to decide whether the likes of Aćif Efendi were their heroes.
They just have be considerate of the feelings of the Serbian majority.
Here I have to
introduce the key question: what is the sin, being a Fascist, a collaborator or
a loser of the war? Were the traitors those who joined the occupiers, those who
collaborated with them, those who turned against the king and the exiled
government, or those who simply ended up losing the war?
When Harry
Truman decorated general Dragoljub Mihailović, commander of the Yugoslav Army
in the Fatherland, a.k.a. the Serbian chetniks, secretly so he didn't have to
explain himself to the new Communist government of Yugoslavia who executed
Mihailović two years earlier, it was understood at the time that an American
president wouldn't award the Legion of
Merit to a Fascist collaborator, but to a proven anti-Fascist. In the middle of
the American anti-Nazi war, Hollywood, ever ready to side with the ideals
projected by Washington, made a movie about general Draža, called Chetniks! The Fighting Guerrillas, and
the Time Magazine put the famed warrior on its front page, celebrating him as
the only anti-German fighter in the entire occupied Europe. Thus, Draža was
definitely anti-Fascist not only because some Serbs thought so, but because his
important contemporaries conceded so and supported him as such. If he was a
Nazi collaborator, I doubt the Americans would side against their interests and
recognize Draža. Although the Communists, the victor in their rebellion against
the legitimate Yugoslav government, executed both the general and Aćif Efendi,
their judgement should solely be analyzed from the perspective of them winning
and exerting a retribution on the losers. Aćif Efendi was not a Fascist because
the Communists executed him, but because he fought alongside the Germans and
the Italians. Draža fought against both occupying armies, and the mere fact
that his Communist enemy sentenced him to death doesn't make him a collaborator
with the occupier but simply the enemy of the Communists.
source: pogledi.rs |
It is time to
introduce another key character, way more fitting this discussion. General
Milan Nedić collaborated with the Nazis as he hesitantly accepted his
appointment to head the provisional government of the German-occupied Serbia.
Even he is still on a level of collaboration below Aćif Efendi because Nedić
did not contribute a single fighting unit to the German war efforts against the
Allies. Nedić's sin was in that he did not join the resistance against the
Germans, effectively impeding it through the German-controlled Serbian Volunteer
Corps, thus rendering himself a traitor to the Serbian cause, although his mere
position as a collaborator helped save hundreds of thousands Serbs escaping
Croatian genocidal policies. Considering this, as well as the fact that the
German official retribution policy in the occupied Serbia mandated the
execution of 100 Serb civilians for one German soldier killed by the resistance
fighters, on one level Nedić cannot be blamed for disregarding the geopolitical
and imperial alliances between Great Powers to try and save lives of the Serbian
people facing extermination. To save the Serbs, Nedić sold out on his World War
I hero reputation. Outside of the fact that Nazism turned out to be an absolute
evil, Nedić's blame has to be revisited and analyzed more honestly. Was it better that he accepted the position to act as Hitler's puppet or that the Germans allowed Croat and Bulgarian Fascists to overrun Serbia? He had no
obligation to fight for the imperial causes of Stalin, Roosevelt or Churchill
at the expense of the Serbian nation, just like Aćif Efendi had no obligation
to join Partisans or Chetniks. If Nedić didn't succumb to the Nazi pressure, I
wonder how many Serbs would have survived the occupation. While Mihailović is
slowly being legally rehabilitated in Serbia, Nedić's rehabilitation is a
national taboo.
One conclusion
is that Aćif Efendi is nowhere near the Mihailović comparison and whoever
compares the anti-Nazi fighter with a Nazi crony is deluded or malicious and
doesn't have the truth and the reconciliation at heart. General Mihailović
should be taken out of this discussion altogether. If there are heroes, he is a
hero to the Serbian people, no question about that. But if Aćif Efendi joined
the Nazis to better the chances of his Muslim brethren in cleaning the area of
Serbs or protecting his people against the Communists or the Chetniks, this
should be stated and analyzed from the appropriate angle. If he was perhaps wrongly accused of , this should be revisited too. Even if this wouldn't remove
the Fascist label from his name, but it would enable Serbia and its Muslim
minority to open more honest discussions, desperately needed.
If Croats can glorify their Fascist past unimpeded and be accepted and protected by the EU as
such, then the table in the Fascist-anti-Fascist debate have turned in the whole
of Europe and Europe is not so anti-Fascist anymore. Then Serbia has to look
past the Communist-borne notions and decide how it wants to view its World War
II past. It has to decide whether its Muslim minority can be allowed to
celebrate its anti-Serb Fascists. If a case is made that they could, then
Serbia should have no regard for those offended by a Nedić rehabilitation
either. Any discussion of a
rehabilitation of Fascists like Aćif Efendi must be predicated on the
rehabilitation of the Serbian Nazi collaborators like Milan Nedić, Dimitrije
Ljotić or Kosta Pećanac. If the Bosniak minority in Serbia is justified in
offending the sentiments of the Serb majority by glorifying Fascists, then the
Serb majority should start looking at its own Nazi collaborators who saved
Serbian lives under a different light. Nazi or Fascist collaboration is in no
way greater a sin than actually being a Nazi or a Fascist.
It is just for
Serbia to start looking at its own past and teach its own offspring the truth
without much concern for geopolitical and ideological mandates imposed by
foreign, often anti-Serbian, interests and doctrines.